|
LONDON ERRATICS
batting
|
4s |
6s |
| * |
Rivington |
bowled |
26 |
3 |
|
|
Andrews |
caught |
20 |
3 |
|
|
Green T |
caught |
4 |
1 |
|
|
Eltringham |
bowled |
50 |
5 |
3 |
|
Poulter |
lbw |
27 |
5 |
|
| |
Neal |
caught |
13 |
1 |
|
|
Rosson M |
bowled |
3 |
|
|
|
Dunabin |
bowled |
4 |
1 |
|
|
Stephenson |
caught |
0 |
|
|
|
Booth |
stumped |
1 |
|
|
|
Green J |
NOT OUT |
2 |
|
|
| 158 all out |
in 36.1 overs |
Fall of wickets:
1(Andrews)41, 2(Rivington)47, 3(GreenT)51, 4(Poulter)97, 5(Eltringham)143,
6(Neal)148, 7(RossonM)151, 8(Stephenson)151, 9(Dunabin)155, 10(Booth)158 |
|
| The Erratics innings had a reasonable start, as a feisty James hit some pleasing front- and back-foot
cover drives, and an out-of-form Peter Andrews ran well. In the 12th over, Peter was pouched at slip trying to give himself room.
In the next over, James punched six more runs then was surprised by a quicker ball (again). Tim hit a sweet boundary to bring up the fifty,
but popped one up to mid-wicket two balls later. Three wickets gone in a rush. |
| Matthew E and Tony Poulter took time to find their touch and their running lacked some
understanding when drinks were taken after 19 overs, the total was only 68 but they kept the score advancing.
Tony enjoyed two heaves against a new spinner with a curious action, then swiped once too often. |
| This spurred Matthew E to cut loose, hitting three sixes in consecutive overs, including one over a
neighbouring pavilion. The fielding side had gone quiet. Another fine four took him to fifty, applauded by his team mates.
Scorer Robert Waller predicted "He'll get out now", so skipper James shouted the helpful advice "Don't get out"... |
| Five wickets down, but the required rate was only 4 an over. Did the Erratics have the nerve to
chip away at the target? Matthew N had his eye in, but skied an ambitious shot against a returning quick. Matt R played a couple of
nice shots, but fell to a spinner ... and Michael was given out caught behind second ball big blow. Chris Dunabin ran the
quick down to third man for four, and was bowled next ball. Jonathan kept out the pace bowler, but John was too rash against a
spinner. |
| So much of this match had been right: the Erratics had bowled out a team with a strong
batting line-up, and had chased competitively. But we still lost. |
|